Restoring Culture to Manage the Subjective

Rob van Gerwen

doi:10.58519/aesthinv.v2i2.11962

Restoring Culture to Manage the Subjective

Authors

Rob van Gerwen University Utrecht

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58519/aesthinv.v2i2.11962

Keywords:

restoration, aesthetic value, subjective, authenticity

Abstract

When we want a cultural object restored, the major reason for this is the value that we attribute to the thing. Paradoxically, restoration is an objective process, but its aim is the preservation of the thing's subjective appreciation. What does this paradox consist in?

References

Ankersmit, Frank. 1993. De historische ervaring. Groningen: Historische Uitgeverij.

Koolhaas, Rem, and Bruce Mau. 1998. S, M, L, XL. Monacelli Press.

Tollebeek, Jo, and Tom Verschaffel. 1992. De vreugden van Houssaye. Apologie van de historische interesse. Amsterdam: Wereldbibliotheek.

Wollheim, Richard. 1984. The Thread of Life. Cambridge, New York:

Cambridge University Press.

— 1993. “Pictorial Style: Two Views.” In The Mind and its Depths, 171–184. Cambridge (Mass.), London (England): Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-16

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2

Section

From the Editor

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Note: up to volume 4 issue 1, an incorrect copyright line appears in the PDFs of the articles.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).