Engagement for Engagement’s Sake
An Ontological Rethinking of the Politics of Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58519/aesthinv.v5i2.12879Keywords:
Literature, Ontology, Politics, Politics of Literature, Engagement, Millennial generationAbstract
The aim of this paper is to search for a new, contemporary, form of literary engagement by avoiding a return to the 20th century idea of literary engagement that presents literature either as autonomous and un-political or as explicitly committed to some political cause. Taking the Dutch poet laurate Lieke Marsman's debut novel Het tegenovergestelde van een mens (The opposite of a human being) as an exemplary case study, this paper stresses that the literature of the millennial generation explores a new and different form of engagement, a form that is consonant with our 21st century living conditions, that are more complex, fluid, and volatile than they have ever been.
References
Berlant, Lauren, and Kathleen Stewart. 2019. The Hundreds. Durham: Duke University Press.
De Boever, Arne. 2019. Against Aesthetic Exceptionalism. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
Demeyer, Hans, and Sven Vitse. 2014. “Revanche of conflict? Pleidooi voor een agonistische literatuurstudie.” Spiegel der Letteren 56 (4): 511–538.
-----. 2020. Affectieve crisis, literair herstel. De romans van de millennialgeneratie. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Felski, Rita. 2015. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ieven, Bram, and Esther Op de Beek. 2019. “Searching for New Weapons? Dutch Studies under Late Modern Conditions.” Journal of Dutch Literature 10 (1): n.p.
Judt, Tony. 2011. Past Imperfect: French Intellectuals 1944-1956. New York: New York University Press.
Marchart, Oliver. 2019. Conflictual Aesthetics. Artistic Activism and the Public Sphere. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
Marsman, Lieke. 2017. Het tegenovergestelde van een mens. Amsterdam/Antwerpen: Atlas Contact.
Marx, William. 2005. L’adieu à la littérature. Histoire d’une dévalorisation. XVIIe-XXe siècle. Paris: Minuit.
Nancy, Jean-Luc. 1993. The Inoperative Community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
-----. 1997a. “The Forgetting of Philosophy (1986).” In The Gravity of Thought. New Jersey: Humanities Press.
-----. 1997b. The Sense of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
-----. 2000. Beig Singular Plural. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
-----. 2018. Expectation: Philosophy, Literature. New York: Fordham
University Press.
-----. 2021. Sexistence. New York: Fordham University Press.
Nelson, Maggie. 2021. On Freedom. Four Songs on Care and Constraint. Minneapolis: Graywolf Press.
Roelofs, Monique. 2020. Arts of Address: Being Alive to Language and the World. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1988. What is Literature? and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sudjic, Olivia. 2019. “Darkly Funny, Desparate and Full of Rage: What Makes a Millennial Novel?” The Guardian, no. 17 August.
Vaessens, Thomas. 2009. De revanche van de roman. Literatuur, autoriteit en engagement. Nijmegen: Vantilt.
Van Rooden, Aukje. 2007. “‘Zoiets als literatuur’: Nancy over de taak van literatuur in de huidige tijd.” In Jean-Luc Nancy. De kunst van het denken, edited by Ignaas Devisch, Peter DeGraeve, and Joost Peeters, 77–98. Utrecht: Klement.
-----. 2015. “Our Engagement with Literature: On Literature as a Way of Being.” Journal of Dutch Literature 6, no. 1.
-----. 2019. Literature, Autonomy and Commitment. New York: Bloomsbury. Translation of Literatuur, autonomie en engagement. Pleidooi voor een nieuw paradigma. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
-----. 2020. “Had ik maar een hondje: Engagement van de millennialgeneratie.” De Reactor.
-----. 2021. “Jean-Luc Nancy, A Romantic Philosopher? On Romance, Love, and Literature.” Angelaki. Journal for the Theoretical Humanities 3-4:113–125.
-----. 2022. L’Intrigue dénouée. Mythe, littérature et communauté dans la pensée de Jean-Luc Nancy. Boston/Leiden: Brill.
Vermeulen, Pieter (ed.). 2021. “Taking Exception to Autonomy: On Arne De Boever’s Against Aesthetic Exceptionalism.” Collateral. Journal for Cross-Cultural Close Reading, vol. 29, Special issue.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Aukje van Rooden
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Note: up to volume 4 issue 1, an incorrect copyright line appears in the PDFs of the articles.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
