References

Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? EDUCAUSE Review. 41, 32–44. Retrieved September 17, 2012, from: http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/web-20-new-wave-innovation-teaching-and-learning.

Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. Technical report, JISC. Retrieved September 17, 2012, from: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf.

Bukvova, H. (2010). Studying research collaboration: a literature review. Sprouts: Working papers on information systems, 10 (3). Retrieved September 17, 2012, from: http://sprouts.aisnet.org/10-3.

Cavalli, N. (2012). I nuovi alfabeti della biblioteca. Nativi digitali: nuovi alfabeti per i lettori, Conference, Milan, Italy: March 15–16.

Chao, J. T. (2007). Student project collaboration using Wikis. Proceedings of the 20th conference on Software Engineering Education & Training (CSEET 2007), pp. 255–261. Dublin, Ireland: July 3–5. doi: 10.1109/CSEET.2007.49.

Churchill, D. (2009). Educational applications of Web 2.0: using blogs to support teaching and learning. British journal of educational technology, 40 (1), 179–183. Retrieved September 17, 2012, from: http://ayersresources.wikispaces.com/file/view/Educational+applications+of+Web+2.0+-+Using+blogs+to+support+teaching+and+learning.pdf.

Churchill, D., Wong, W., Law, N., Salter, D., & Tai, B. (2009). Social bookmarking-repository-networking: possibilities for support of teaching and learning in higher education. Serials review, 35 (3), 142–148. doi: 10.1016/j.serrev.2009.04.006.

CIBER & Emerald Group Publishing (2010). Social media and research workflow. Retrieved February 18, 2013, from: http://ciber-research.eu/download/20101111-social-media-report.pdf.

Collis, B. (1999). Designing for differences: cultural issues in the design of WWWbased course-support sites. British journal of educational technology, 30 (3), 201–215. doi: 10.1111/1467-8535.00110.

Ebner, M., & Maurer, H. (2009). Can weblogs and microblogs change traditional scientific writing? Future Internet, 1, 47–58. Retrieved September 17, 2012, from: http://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/1/1/47/pdf.

Finholt, T. A. (2003), Collaboratories as a new form of scientific organization, Economics of innovation and new technology 12 (1), 5–25.

Grosseck, G. (2009). To use or not to use web 2.0 in higher education? Procedia social and behavioural sciences, 1, 478–482. Retrieved September 17, 2012, from: http:// webpages.csus.edu/~sac43949/pdfs/to%20use%20or%20not%20to%20use.pdf.

Gu, F., & Widén-Wulff, G. (2011). Scholarly communication and possible changes in the context of social media. A Finnish case study. The electronic library, 29 (6), 762–776. doi: 10.1108/02640471111187999.

Kalb, H., Bukvova, H., & Schoop, E. (2009). The digital researcher: exploring the use of social software in the research process. Sprouts: Working papers on information systems, 9 (34). Retrieved September 17, 2012, from: http://sprouts.aisnet.org/9–34.

Lyon, L. (2009). Open science at web-scale: Optimising participation and predictive potential consultative report. DCC Report commissioned by JISC. Retrieved September 17, 2012, from: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/reports/2009/opensciencerpt.aspx.

Mahapatra, A. (2010). Researchers in a brave new Web 2.0 world. ACS Chemical biology, 5 (9), 799–800. doi: 10.1021/cb100268t.

McMahon, T. M., Powell, J. E., Hopkins, M., Alcazar, D. A., Miller, L. E., Collins, L., et al. (2012). Social awareness tool for science research. D-Lib Magazine, 18 (3/4). Retrieved September 17, 2003, from: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march12/mcmahon/03mcmahon.html.

O’Reilly, T. (2008). Why Dell.com (was) more Enterprise 2.0 than Dell IdeaStorm. 29 September. Retrieved September 17, 2012, from: http://radar.oreilly.com/2008/09/why-dell-dot-com-is-more-enterprise.html.

Park, T. K. (2011). The visibility of Wikipedia in scholarly publications. First Monday, 16 (8). Retrieved September 17, 2012, from: http://www.firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3492/3031.

Parker, K. R., & Chao, J. T. (2007). Wiki as a teaching tool. Interdisciplinary journal of knowledge and learning objects, 3, 57–72. Retrieved September 17, 2012, from: http://ijklo.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p057-072Parker284.pdf.

Ponte, D., & Simon, J. (2011). Scholarly communication 2.0: exploring researchers’ opinions on Web 2.0 for scientific knowledge creation, evaluation and dissemination. Serials review, 37 (3), 149–156. doi: 10.1016/j.serrev.2011.06.002.

Raynes-Goldie, K. (2010). Aliases, creeping and world cleaning: understanding privacy in the age of Facebook. First Monday, 15 (1). Retrieved September 17, 2012, from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2775/2432.

RIN (2010, July). If you build it will they come? How researchers perceive and use web 2.0. Retrieved September 17, 2012, from: http://rinarchive.jisc-collections.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-research/use-and-relevance-web-20-researchers.

Salter, D. J. (2008). The challenge of feedback: too little too late. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of World conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2008 (pp. 3925–3926). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

Siemens, G. (2008). A world without courses. 6 March, 2008. Elearnspace (blog). Retrieved September 17, 2012, from: http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2008/03/06/a-world-without-courses/.

Yoo, S. J., & Huang, W. D. (2011). Comparison of Web 2.0 technology acceptance level based on cultural differences. Educational technology & society, 14 (4), 241–252. Retrieved September 17, 2012, from: http://www.ifets.info/journals/14_4/20.pdf.

Zimmer, M. (2008), The externalities of search 2.0: The emerging privacy threats when the drive for the perfect search engine meets Web 2.0. First Monday, 13 (3). Retrieved September 17, 2012, from: http://www.firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2136/1944.