Adema, J. (2018). Scholar-led publishing: Scaling small. Presented at Beyond APCs: Alternative Open Access Publishing Business Models, OpenAIRE, The Hague, Netherlands. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www.slideshare.net/ OpenAIRE_eu/openaire-workshop-beyond-apcs-janneke-adema .

Adema, J. (2019). Towards a roadmap for OA monographs. A knowledge exchange report. Bristol: Knowledge Exchange. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2644997 .

Adema, J., & Stone, G. (2017). Changing publishing ecologies: A landscape study of new university presses and academic-led publishing. London: Jisc. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/6666/ .

Adin, R. (2017, March 8). The decline & fall of editorial quality. An American Editor. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://americaneditor.wordpress. com/2017/03/08/the-decline-fall-of-editorial-quality/ .

Anonymous. (2019). Potential predatory scholarly open access journals, Beall’s list of predatory journals and publishers. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://beallslist. weebly.com/standalone-journals.html .

Anonymous Academic. (2015, September 4). Academics are being hoodwinked into writing books nobody can buy. The Guardian. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2015/sep/04/ academics-are-being-hoodwinked-into-writing-books-nobody-can-buy .

Association of American University Presses. (2016). AAUP handbook: Best practices for peer review. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from http://www.aupresses.org/images/ stories/documents/bppr_booklet_web_042016.pdf .

Association of Research Libraries. (2000). Principles for emerging systems of scholarly publishing (a.k.a. Tempe Principles). Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www.arl. org/resources/principles-for-emerging-systems-of-scholarly-publishing/ .

Ayris, P., & Ignat, T. (2018). Defining the role of libraries in the Open Science landscape: A reflection on current European practice. Open Information Science, 2(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2018-0001 .

Ball, J., & Stone, G. (2019). Mainstreaming open: How can libraries transition their culture, services and practices to open. Presented at the RLUK conference, London. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/7182/ .

Ball, J., Stone, G., & Thompson, S. (2019). Opening up the library: Transforming our structures, policies and practices. Presented at the 48th LIBER Annual Conference, “Research Libraries for Society”, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/7422/ .

Barnes, L. (2018a). Reputation, reputation, reputation – quality control and reward systems. Open Book Publishers Blog. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0173.0091 .

Barnes, L. (2018b). ScholarLed collaboration: A powerful engine to grow open access publishing. LSE Impact Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/10/26/ scholarled-collaboration-a-powerful-engine-to-grow-open-access-publishing/ .

Bell, K. (2017). ‘Predatory’ open access journals as parody: Exposing the limitations of ‘legitimate’ academic publishing, tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 15(2), 651–662. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v15i2.870 .

Bell, K., Claassen, J., Nyahodza, L. Raju, R., & Stetka, V. (Eds.). (2018). Who’s the “predator” again? An introduction to “predatory” publishing. punctum books, Rope Press, Post Office Press. https://doi.org/10.17613/M6N58CK3D .

Bilder, G., Lin, J., & Neylon, C. (2015). Principles for open scholarly infrastructures. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1314859.v1 .

Bosman, J., & Kramer, B. (2016). Hypothetical workflows [blog post]. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from: https://101innovations.wordpress.com/workflows/ .

Brewerton, A. (2003). Inspired! Award-winning library marketing. New Library World, 104(7/8), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074800310488040 .

British Academy. (2018). Open access and monographs: Where are we now? Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www.britac.ac.uk/publications/ open-access-monographs-where-are-we-now .

Budd, J. M., & Connaway, L. S. (1997). University faculty and networked information: Results of a survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(9), 843–852. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199709)48:9<843::AID-ASI8>3.0.CO;2-R .

Cabells. (2017). The journal blacklist. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www2. cabells.com/about-blacklist .

cOAlition S. (2019a). Accelerating the transition to full and immediate Open Access to scientific publications. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www.coalition-s.org/ wp-content/uploads/PlanS_Principles_and_Implementation_310519.pdf .

cOAlition S. (2019b). Why Plan S. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www. coalition-s.org/why-plan-s/ .

Collins, C. (2010, June 7). Lambert Academic Publishing continues to spam [blog post]. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from http://chrisnf.blogspot.com/2010/06/lambert academic-publishing-continues.html .

Cross, A. (2019). In the lands of the Romanovs: An annotated bibliography of first-hand English-language accounts of the Russian Empire (1613–1917). Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www.openbookpublishers.com/ product/268 .

De Wit, H., Altbach, P. G., & Leask, B. (2018, November 5). Addressing the crisis in academic publishing. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www. insidehighered.com/blogs/world-view/addressing-crisis-academic-publishing .

Deville, J. (2019). Quality assurance and peer review [conference presentation]. Presented at ‘Critical Issues in Open Access and Scholarly Communications’, Goldsmiths, University of London. http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/7431/ .

Deville, J., Sondervan, J., Stone, G., & Wennström, S. (2018, July). Rebels with a cause? Supporting new library and scholar-led open access publishing through organic collaboration and academic community building. Presented at the LIBER Annual Conference 2018, Lille, France. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1306506 .

Djupe, P. A., Smith, A. E., & Sokhey, A. E. (2017, November 13). Are potential peer reviewers overwhelmed altruists or free-riders? New data reveal great inequality in peer reviewing in the social sciences. Duck of Minerva. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://duckofminerva.com/2017/11/are-potential-peer-reviewers overwhelmed-altruists-or-free-riders-new-data-reveal-great-inequality-in-peer reviewing-in-the-social-sciences.html .

Esposito, J. (2015, September 14). What is “publishing” if even a library can do it? [blog post] Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet. org/2015/09/14/what-is-publishing-if-even-a-library-can-do-it/ .

Eve, M. P. (2018). University of Huddersfield Press becomes first to use hosted Janeway service for journals. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www.openlibhums.org/ news/274/ .

Ferwerda, E., Pinter, F., & Stern, N. (2017). A landscape study on open access and monographs: Policies, funding and publishing in eight European countries. Bristol: Knowledge Exchange. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.815932 .

Fyfe, A., Coate, C., Curry, S., Lawson, S. Moxham, N., & Røstvik, C. M. (2017). Untangling academic publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.546100 .

Gibbons, S. (2018, July). Pushing libraries beyond traditional boundaries. Opening keynote presentation at Jisc and CNI leaders conference 2018, Oxford. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www.slideshare.net/JISC/pushing-libraries beyond-traditional-boundaries .

Goldsmiths Press, London (2019). About Goldsmiths Press. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www.gold.ac.uk/goldsmiths-press/about/ .

HEFCE. (2013). Consultation on open access in the post-2014 Research Excellence Framework. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://web.archive.org/ web/20180730015354/http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/year/2013/201316/ .

HEFCE. (2016). Consultation on the second Research Excellence Framework. London: HEFCE. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20180422040939/ http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/HEFCE,2014/Content/Pubs/2016/201636/ HEFCE2016_36.pdf .

Helmer, M., Schottdorf, M., Neef, A., & Battaglia, B. (2017). Gender bias in scholarly peer review. eLife, 6, e21718. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.21718.001 .

Hobson, M. (2019). Denis Diderot ‘Rameau’s Nephew’ – ‘Le Neveu de Rameau’: A Multi-Media Bilingual Edition. M. Hobson (Ed.), K. E. Tunstall & C. Warman (Trans.), P. Duc (Music), Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/498 .

IFLA. (2019). Library Publishing Special Interest Group. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from: https://www.ifla.org/library-publishing .

Jubb, M. (2017). Academic books and their futures: A report to the AHRC and the British Library. London: Arts and Humanities Research Council/British Library. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://academicbookfuture.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/ academic-books-and-their-futures_jubb1.pdf .

Kara, H. (2019). Academic publishers and production values. [webblog] Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://helenkara.com/2019/04/05/academic-publishers and-production-values/ .

Kovanis, M., Porcher, R. Ravaud, P., & Trinquart, L. (2016). The global burden of journal peer review in the biomedical literature: Strong imbalance in the collective enterprise. PLoS One, 11(11), e0166387, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0166387 .

Larivière, V., Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital age. PLoS One 10(6), e0127502, 1–15. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127502 .

Lippincott, S. K. (2016). The Library Publishing Coalition: Organizing libraries to enhance scholarly publishing. Insights, 29(2), 186–191. https://doi.org/10.1629/ uksg.296 .

McClanahan, K., Wu, L., Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (2010). Embracing change: Perceptions of e-journals by faculty members. Learned Publishing, 23(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1087/20100304 .

Milloy, C. (2018, December 5). Supporting a diverse scholarly publishing ecosystem: Introducing our new dynamic purchasing service [blog post]. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://scholarlycommunications.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2018/12/05/ supporting-a-diverse-scholarly-publishing-ecosystem-introducing-our-new dynamic-purchasing-service/ .

Newton, H. (2014). Experiment in open peer review for books suggests increased fairness and transparency in feedback process. LSE Impact Blog. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/02/28/ palgrave-macmillan-open-peer-review-for-book-proposals/ .

Neylon, C., Montgomery, L., Ozaygen, A., Saunders, N., & Pinter, F. (2018). The visibility of open access monographs in a European context: Full Report. Zenodo. https:// doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1230342 .

Nwagwu, W. E. (2016). Open Access in the developing regions: Situating the altercations about predatory publishing. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 40(1), 58–80.

OAPEN. (n.d.). Description of the peer review process per partner. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from http://www.oapen.org/content/peer-review-process-introduction .

OASPA. (2019). Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://oaspa.org/ .

Open Library of Humanities. (n.d.). The OLH model. [Website]. Retrieved May 22, 2019, from https://www.openlibhums.org/site/about/the-olh-model/ .

PlanSinHSS. (2019, February 8). An HSS perspective on Plan S [blog post]. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://plansinhss.home.blog/ .

punctum books. (n.d.). Hyperrhiz Electric. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from http:// electric.press/ .

Research England. (2019). Research England awards £2.2m to project to improve and increase open access publishing. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://re.ukri.org/ news-events-publications/news/re-awards-2-2m-to-project-to-improve-open-access publishing/ .

Schlosser, M. (2018, March 1). First Library Publishing Curriculum modules released: Content and impact [blog post]. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https:// librarypublishing.org/first-library-publishing-curriculum-modules-released/ .

ScholarLed. (2019). The enclosure of scholarly infrastructures, Open Access books & the necessity of community [blog post]. Retrieved August 21, 2019 from https://blog. scholarled.org/open-research-library/ .

Science Europe. (2019). Funders and supporters. Retrieved from https://www. coalition-s.org/funders/ .

Skinner, K., Lippincott, S., Speer, J., & Walters, T. O. (2014). Library-as-publisher: Capacity building for the library publishing subfield. Journal of Electronic Publishing, 17(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0017.207 .

Smith, K. L. (2017). Examining publishing practices: Moving beyond the idea of predatory open access. Insights, 30(3), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.388 .

Snijder, R. (2016). Metadata for open access monographs. The Hague/Bristol: OAPEN/Jisc. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www.jisc-collections.ac.uk/Global/Projects/ IOAMS/Guides/Guide%20on%20OA%20books%20metadata%20Feb%202016 .pdf.

Speier, C., Palmer, J., Wren, D., & Hahn, S. (1999). Faculty perceptions of electronic journals as scholarly communication: A question of prestige and legitimacy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(6), 537–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/ (SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:6<537::AID-ASI9>3.3.CO;2-Y .

Stone, G. (2017a). The rise of new university presses and academic-led presses in the UK. Presented at the 14th Munin Conference, Tromsø, Norway. Retrieved from http:// repository.jisc.ac.uk/6729/ .

Stone, G. (2017b). Developing a sustainable publishing model for a university press: A case study of the University of Huddersfield, 2011–2015. (Doctoral thesis). Huddersfield: University of Huddersfield. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from http://eprints.hud. ac.uk/id/eprint/33791/ .

Stone, G. (2018). OA monographs discovery in the library supply chain: Draft report and recommendations. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://scholarlycommunications. jiscinvolve.org/wp/2018/10/25/oa-monographs-discovery-in-the-library-supply chain-draft-report-and-recommendations/ .

Stone, G., Jensen, K., & Beech, M. (2016). Publishing undergraduate research: Linking teaching and research through a dedicated peer-reviewed open access journal. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 47(2), 147–170. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jsp.47.2.147 .

Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., & Koch, J. (2009). Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 689–709. https://doi. org/10.5465/amr.34.4.zok689 .

Tanner, S. (2016). An analysis of the Arts and Humanities submitted research outputs to the REF2014 with a focus on academic books. London: AHRC. https://doi.org/10.18742/ RDM01-76 .

Taylor, M., & Jensen, K. S. H. (2018). Engaging and supporting a university press scholarly community. Publications, 6(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ publications6020013 .

Tham, S. (2019). Tales of darkness and light: Soso Tham’s the old days of the Khasis. J. Hujon (trans.). Cambridge: Open Book Publishers. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/746 .

Thompson, S., & Stone, G. (2019). Mainstreaming open e-books: Transforming culture, services and practices to acquire open? Presented at the 10th NAG Collection Development seminar: Streamlining and Futureproofing your Collection, Birmingham. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/7414/ .

Truth, F. (2012). Pay big to publish fast: Academic journal rackets. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 10(2), 54–105. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from http://www. jceps.com/wp-content/uploads/PDFs/10-2-02.pdf .

Ubiquity Press. (2019). The Ubiquity partner network. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www.ubiquitypress.com/site/partners/ .

UCL. (2019). Who we are. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www.uclpress. co.uk/pages/who-we-are .

University of Huddersfield. (n.d.). Our team. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://unipress.hud.ac.uk/site/our-team/ .

Vega. (2019). Vega is laying a new foundation for online openacademic publishing. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from http://www.vegapublish.info/ .

Vidal, F. (2018). Keynote address for Open Science at LIBER. Ministry of higher education, research and innovation, République Française. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from https://www.ouvrirlascience.fr/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ Discours_Science_Ouverte_a_LIBER_EN_2018.07.04.pdf .

Walker, R., Barros B., Conejo R., Conejo, R. Neumann, K., & Telefont, M. (2015). Personal attributes of authors and reviewers, social bias and the outcomes of peer review: A case study. F1000Research 2015, 4(21), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.12688/ f1000research.6012.2 .

Watkinson, C. (2014). The university as publisher revisited. Insights, 27(2), 181–185. http://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.131 .

Weinberg, J. (2015). Answers from academic publishers. Daily Nous. Retrieved August 21, 2019, from http://dailynous.com/2015/05/28/answers-from-academic publishers/ .

Wennström, S., Schubert, G., Stone, G., & Sondervan, J. (2019). The significant difference in impact: An exploratory study about the meaning and value of metrics for open access monographs. ELPUB 2019 23rd edition of the International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Jun 2019, Marseille, France. hal-02141879.