American Meteorological Society. (2013). Full and open access to data. Retrieved January 19, 2015, from "https://www2.ametsoc.org/ams/index.cfm/about-ams/ams-statements/statements-of-the-ams-in-force/full-and-open-access-to-data/.
Borgman, C.L. (2015). Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Carey, B. (2011, November 2). Fraud case seen as red flag for psychology research. The New York Times. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/03/health/research/noted-dutch-psychologist-stapel-accused-of-research-fraud.html?_r=0.
Center for Open Science. (2015). Guidelines for transparency and openness promotion (TOP) in journal policies and practices “The TOP guidelines”. Retrieved January 19, 2016, from https://osf.io/ud578/.
Cicerone, R.J. (2015). Research reproducibility, replicability, reliability (Speech). Retrieved January 19, 2016, from http://www.nasonline.org/about-nas/leadership/president/2015-presidents-address.pdf.
Collins, F.S., & Tabak, L.A. (2014). NIH plans to enhance reproducibility. Nature, 505, 612–613. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://www.nature.com/polopoly_fs/1.14586!/menu/main/topColumns/topLeftColumn/pdf/505612a.pdf.
Corrall, S., & Pinfield, S. (2014) Coherence of “open” initiatives in higher education and research: Framing a policy agenda. In iConference 2014 Proceedings (pp. 293–313). doi:10.9776/14085. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/47316/085_corrVersion.pdf?sequence=5.
Corrall, S., Kennan, M.A., & Afzal, W. (2013). Bibliometrics and research data management services: Emerging trends in library support for research. Library Trends, 61(3), 636–674. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://d-scholarship.pitt.edu/18948/1/08_61_3_corrall_636-674.pdf.
Cox, A.M., & Pinfield, S. (2014). Research data management and libraries: Current activities and future priorities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 46(4), 299–316. doi:10.1177/0961000613492542.
Denker, S.P. (2016, January 6). A proactive approach to reproducibility with evidence-based research on research. PLOS Blog post January 6 2016. Retrieved 19 January, 2016, from http://blogs.plos.org/plos/2016/01/a-proactive-approach-to-reproducibility-with-evidence-based-research-on-research/.
Easterbrook, S.M. (2014). Open code for open science? Nature Geoscience, 7, 779–781. doi:10.1038/ngeo2283. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v7/n11/pdf/ngeo2283.pdf.
Errington, T.M., Iorns, E., Gunn, W., Tan, F.E., Lomax, J., & Nosek, B.A. (2014). An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research. eLife 2014, 3, e04333. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04333 . Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4270077/.
Etzioni, A. (2010). Is transparency the best disinfectant? Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(4), 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00366.x. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://www.gwu.edu/~ccps/etzioni/documents/295Transparency.pdf.
Fang, F.C., Steen R.G., & Casadevall, A. (2013). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(42), 17028–17033. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from doi:10.1073/pnas.1212247109.
FASEB. (2016, January 14). Enhancing research reproducibility: Recommendations from the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. Retrieved January 19, 2016, from: http://www.faseb.org/Portals/2/PDFs/opa/2016/FASEB_Enhancing Research Reproducibility.pdf.
Gezelter, J.D. (n.d.). Open science and verifiability. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://web.stanford.edu/~vcs/Nov21/dg-OpenScienceandVerifiability.pdf.
Gov.UK. (2013). G8 Open data charter and technical annex. Retrieved January 19, 2016, from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-data-charter/g8-open-data-charter-and-technical-annex.
Holdren, J.P., Orszag, P., & Prouty, P.F. (2009, February 24). President’s memorandum on transparency and open government – Interagency collaboration. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_fy2009/m09-12.pdf.
ICSU. (2015). Open data in a big data world. An international accord. Retrieved January 19, 2016, from http://www.icsu.org/science-international/accord/open-data-in-a-big-data-world-long.
Ince, D. (2011) The Duke University scandal – what can be done? Significance, 8(3), 113–115. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2011.00505.x.
Lauer, M. (2015, October 30). Bolstering trust in science through rigorous standards. NIH Open Mike Blog post. Retrieved January 19, 2016, from https://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2015/10/30/bolstering-trust-in-science-through-rigorous-standards/.
Lyon, L. (2009). Open science at web-scale: Optimising participation and predictive potential consultative report. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://opus.bath.ac.uk/30056/1/open-science-report-6nov09-final-sentojisc.pdf.
Lyon, L., & Beaton, B. (2015). Citizen science, open access, open data, and research inclusivity. In 2015 ALISE Annual Conference, Chicago. Abstract retrieved September 10, 2015, from https://alise2015.sched.org/event/a881a3eeb8aac9e003eb3831916bb92a%23.VfGyBZfWyio.
Lyon, L., & Brenner, A. (2015). Bridging the data talent gap: Positioning the iSchool as an agent for change. International Journal of Digital Curation 10(1), 111–122. doi:10.2218/ijdc.v10i1.349. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/viewFile/10.1.111/384.
Lyon, L., Mattern, E., Acker, A., & Langmead, A. (n.d.) Applying translational principles to data science curriculum development. In: iPReS 2015 Conference, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. (To be published in the Phaidra Repositry).
Marcus, A., & Oransky, I. (2012, August 1). Bring on the Transparency Index. The Scientist, 24. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/32427/title/Bring-On-the-Transparency-Index/.
Mayernik, M.S., Callaghan, S., Leigh, R., Tedds, J., & Worley, S. (2014). Peer review of datasets: When, why and how. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 96,191– 201. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00083.1. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00083.1.
NIH. (2015a, June 9). Enhancing reproducibility through rigor and transparency. Notice Number NOT-OD-15-103. Retrieved January 19, 2016, from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-15-103.html.
NIH. (2015b, November 2) Rigor and reproducibility. Retrieved January 19, 2016, from http://grants.nih.gov/reproducibility/index.htm.
NIH. (2016, January 28). Scientific rigor in NIH grant applications. Blog post by Mike Lauer. Retrieved January 19, 2016, from http://nexus.od.nih.gov/all/2016/01/28/scientific-rigor-in-nih-grant-applications/.
Nosek, B.A. (2012). An open, large-scale collaborative effort to estimate the reproducibility of psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 657–660. doi: 10.1177/1745691612462588. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://pps.sagepub.com/content/7/6/657.full.pdf+html.
Nosek, B.A., & Lakens, D. (2014). Registered reports: A method to increase the credibility of published results [Editorial]. Social Psychology, 45(3), 137–141. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000192.
OECD. (2007). OECD principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/38500813.pdf.
OECD. (2015). Making open science a reality. Retrieved January 19, 2016, from https://www.innovationpolicyplatform.org/content/open-science.
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716. Retrieved January 19, 2016, from http://science.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716.full.
Peng, R.D. (2011). Reproducible research in computational science. Science, 334(6060), 1226–1227. doi:10.1126/science.1213847. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://www.sciencemag.org/content/334/6060/1226.full.pdf.
RCUK. (2015). RCUK Common Principles on Data Policy. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/DataPolicy/.
Royal Society Report. (2012). Science as an open enterprise: open data for open science. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/projects/sape/2012-06-20-SAOE.pdf.
Si, L., Xing, W., Zhuang, X., Hua, X., & Zhou, L. (2015) Investigation and analysis of research data services in university libraries. The Electronic Library, 33(3), 417–449. doi:10.1108/EL-07-2013-0130.
Stodden, V. (2009). Enabling reproducible research: open licensing for scientific innovation. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1362040.
Stodden, V., Bailey, D.H., Borwein, R.J., LeVeque, W.R., Rider, W., & Stein, W. (2013). Setting the default to reproducible: Reproducibility in computational and experimental mathematics. ICERM Workshop December 10–14, 2012, Providence. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://stodden.net/icerm_report.pdf.
Stodden, V., Leisch F., & Peng, R.D. (2014). Implementing reproducible research. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press. Available as an eBook.
Taylor, B.N., & Kuyatt, C.E. (1994). Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results. NIST Technical Note 1297. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/guidelines/TN1297/tn1297s.pdf.
The Economist. (2010, May 18). The science of climate change: The clouds of unknowing. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://www.economist.com/node/15719298.
The Economist. (2013, October 17). Unreliable research: Trouble at the lab. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-think-science-self-correcting-alarming-degree-it-not-trouble.
University of Bath. (2014). Research Data Policy. Retrieved September 10, 2015, from http://www.bath.ac.uk/research/data/policy/research-data-policy.html.