This is an outdated version published on 27-10-2022. Read the most recent version.

Smart Contracts: Tales of Trust and Certainty

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26116/techreg.2022.010

Keywords:

smart contracts, digital contracts, crypto-regulation, blockchains, Ethereum, smart contract regulation

Abstract

Given the continuing fascination with “magic computers” and “self-executing code,” it is necessary to re-examine the promises – and premises - of technology-driven improvements to transacting practices purportedly introduced by smart contracts. Contrary to the popular narrative, smart contracts do not eliminate the need for trust and are technically incapable of guaranteeing performance. The fascination with clear and unbreakable rules that are executed by code obfuscates the fact that such rules may be suboptimal and may incorrectly represent what was agreed. It also obscures the fact that it is impossible to write perfect code. Being in plain view and impossible to mody, changes nothing in this regard. Trust and certainty do not magically emerge from immutability or transparency. Regulatory efforts in this area must be based on facts, not fairy tales.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
TechReg.2022.010-Mik cover  page

Downloads

Published

27-10-2022

Versions

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Smart Contracts: Tales of Trust and Certainty. (2022). Technology and Regulation, 2022, 100-112. https://doi.org/10.26116/techreg.2022.010